Possibility of Failure

Henrik is in the middle of doing something remarkable. An important goal is one in which there is always the possibility of failure. Most cyclists gear their training to relatively short distances between 20-40 miles. With more experience, the thought of a Metric Century Ride looms. Most cyclists can push their way to 62 miles.

Finishing a US Century (100 miles) becomes the standard for pushing the limits of recreational riding. It is the Holy Grail of most cycling enthusiasts.

Ask Henrik why he rides further. He will tell you that the possibility of failure at 100 miles is minimal. To truly stretch, there has to be the possibility of failure. Enter Randonneuring. Randonneuring is long-distance unsupported endurance cycling. This year, it’s qualifying events started with a mild 200K, around 124 miles (Jan). The 300K clocked out around 186 miles (Feb). The 400K on Saturday, March 19, runs 240 miles. At this point, the typical question is, “in one day?” The answer is yes.

The next event will be a 600K which translates to 372 miles (April). The last qualifier before the big ride is a 1000K, 620 miles (May). The final event is a 1200K running 744 miles with a 90 hour finish cutoff. Yes, Henrik will sleep somewhere in the middle, but only about 4 hours.

When you look at your stretch goals, what do you see? An important goal is one in which there is always the possibility of failure. See you on the bike. -TF

Roger That

“Houston, I think we are lost.”

“Roger, that. How far have you traveled since the last checkpoint?”

“Houston, we have traveled for six hours since our last transmission. Did we pass a checkpoint?”

“Spaceprobe II, we do not show any checkpoints in your area. How far off course are you?”

“Houston, we do not know the nearest checkpoints and we do not know how far off course we are.”

“Roger that, Spaceprobe II.”

“Houston, do we need to make a course correction?”

“Spaceprobe II, it would seem you need to make a course correction.”

“Houston, what course correction should we make?”

“Spaceprobe II, can you reverse your course and retrace your current flightpath?”

“Negatory, Houston. Our on-board computers only track spacecraft movement in relation to the target destination.”

“Spaceprobe II. What is your target destination?”

“Houston, we do not know our target destination. It was never discussed at the meeting on Friday.”

“Roger, that. Spaceprobe II, have you checked your flightplan documents?”

“Houston, we seem to have no flightplan documents.”

“Spaceprobe II, then how do you know how far off course you are?”

“Houston, I think we are lost.”

“Roger that.” -TF

Second Things Never

Pamela had just emerged from a generous chewing out from her boss. The incomplete item was on her list, but there was no check mark beside it. Not done, in fact, not started.

On a typical day, Pamela would work down her list, dutifully checking off items completed. It was a curious list, lots of things to do, some today, some next week, some next month. It was tattered with a little coffee cup ring across the bottom right hand corner.

We had to change her method to decide what’s next. Pamela’s current system was simple. Make the list, then do the easy stuff. It was obviously not working. At least it was obvious to her boss.

Covey’s rule of First Things First has a corollary, Second Things Never. Pamela began to work a new system using a scale of (5-1 Important) and a scale of (5-1 Urgent) to decide on the priority of each item on her list. Once the priority was established, she invoked the rule, Second Things Never.

This required one more step. Once an item was completed, Pamela had to review the list to make sure the priorities had not changed. Priorities often change, sometimes in the middle of the day. Check on your priorities. Second Things Never. -TF

Employer of Choice

The mission statement was clear, “We are the employer of choice!” But, when Anthony looked around at the company’s talent pool, that statement rang hollow. Turnover was running 68% per year with exit interviews pointing to better wages at another company. Anthony had tried paying more, yet attracted no higher quality worker than he had now. Training times were longer, waste and scrap was higher and throughput was at an all time low.

We changed the program. I told Anthony if he wanted to be the employer of choice, he had to start by choosing better. Choosing better meant turning away more of the applicant pool. We implemented three different skills tests. Two of the tests involved the operation of some basic equipment and one test was a paper and pencil test on some basic knowledge specific to the company’s manufacturing.

We raised the starting wage by $1 per hour. Any current employee below the new wage who could pass the skills test was also raised.

Of the 23 applicants the following week, Anthony would have made job offers to 18 of them. He had always made more offers than he had openings because he depended on a “no show” factor. In this new program, only nine passed the skills test. Anthony made offers to seven of those. All seven reported to work. This was the beginning.

To become the employer of choice, your company has to become a choosier employer. -TF

A Hanging in the Morning

If compliance in the workplace were good enough, then perhaps Wyatt Earp was right. “Nothing focuses the mind like a hanging in the morning.”

Yet, compliance is only the first stepping stone toward an attitude of commitment. If compliance is all we get, then managers can expect directives to be short-lived and require the omnipresence of the manager, either in person or by remote control cameras, color, of course.

We can talk all warm and fuzzy about commitment and compliance, but it boils down to these two things, time frame and proximity of the manager. If all I need is short term compliance and I plan to be there to drive the bus, compliance works just fine. If I need everyone to stay an extra half hour to help me pack some boxes, then I am ordering pizza to make sure I get the compliance I need to get my boxes packed.

However, if I need long term energy to be sustained on a project when I am not there, out of town on a sales call, then, as a manager, I need commitment. Compliance and pizza don’t work. Commitment behind an initiative lasts longer and requires less of my presence as a manager. -TF

Living Off of the Crumbs

One more month and they would have been doomed. Luckily, the economy came back, margins thickened (just enough) and their main competitor finally got off of their back. The past three years had been a marketplace gauntlet.

Now, Benjamin could breathe just long enough to figure out what happened, most importantly, how to position his company so this would not happen again. Benjamin’s stomach lining could not take another economic downturn.

Three years ago, Benjamin’s company enjoyed a distant third position in the market, behind two strong competitors. The competitors were in nearby states, close, yet far enough away to be out of sight (and out of mind). As the economy began to squeeze, Benjamin noticed he was losing small contracts to his out-of-state rivals. When things got tighter, the size of those lost contracts got bigger. Thinking he was on top of his game, Benjamin smiled when he saw his down line competitors having trouble. One filed bankruptcy, another closed facilities, the last just stopped doing business. Benjamin did not see what was happening, nor did he realize that he was the next target.

When times are flush, lots of competitors can co-exist, even the small dogs can live off of the crumbs dropped by the bigger companies. But when times get tough, the bigger companies cannot afford to see their revenues drop, so they get aggressive.

Who do they attack? Number one does NOT attack number two. Number one attacks number six, the weakest and easiest target. With number six out of the way, both number one and number two begin to work their way up the food chain, systematically decimating the market.

The lesson for Benjamin. Always position yourself as number one or number two in your defined marketplace. When times get tough, anything less leaves your company vulnerable to having your lunch eaten. -TF

Teamwork is not a Goal

The past two weeks had been a blur and the project was no further along than it was a month ago. Marilyn was beside herself. True, her team had been having problems, but that was what the seminar was all about. They had traveled off-site, climbed ropes, cheered each other around an obstacle course. Now, they were back and nothing had changed.

No group hugs here. If you want to create teamwork, get a group of people together, who each have a stake in the process and solve a real problem. Teamwork is not a goal of management. Teamwork is a process created by a manager to solve a real problem.

Often, I see companies spend a ton of money on feel-good programs in a feeble attempt to build a team. This feel-good stuff promotes teamwork, but teamwork is much more in the real world. Teamwork is driven by a purpose. Real teamwork is driven by real purposes. Long lasting teamwork is driven by long lasting purposes. Intense teamwork is driven by intense purposes.

If you want to build a team, get a group of people together and solve a real problem. -TF

Planning is a Waste of Time

“I think planning is a waste of time!” decried Roger. I was not sure if he was just trying to get out of the assignment, or if he truly had a bad experience with planning. Roger continued, “We plan, but we never stick to the plan. There are too many unknowns to think about. All kinds of things can happen that we cannot predict. We might find an opportunity that was completely unforeseen that renders our plan obsolete. It takes too much time; I don’t want to do it. I mean, it’s not that I don’t want to do it, I just don’t want to write it down. Things change too quickly.”

Enough. I stop him. “What are the benefits of planning? If you do your job well, what are the positive things that come from a written plan? If you do not have a plan, then how does your team know what to work on next?”

Roger thought for a minute, “I just have to be specific about what I want them to do next.”

“Do you realize how much pressure that puts on you to constantly monitor their activities, to constantly be devising the next task, and the next task? Do you realize that no one is watching your backside because the team has no understanding of where the project his headed?”

The downfall of most managers is the incredible stress they place themselves under. The team who does not understand the direction of travel MUST depend on the manager for every step and move. Problems cannot be anticipated by the team because they don’t know from which direction the arrows will arrive. This leaves the manager in a never-winning battle to anticipate everything and solve every problem. This is not where I would want to be. -TF

Change and the Manager

If I did not allow you to come to work tomorrow, what tasks would your team find to work on? I get a variety of responses, but they all come down to this: Tomorrow, they would work pretty much on the same things they worked on today.

And if I held you back another day, what tasks would your team find to work on, and what methods would they use? The responses continue to distill: They would work pretty much on the same things as today, using the same methods as today.

Good. Now, how long could your team continue to do that without you? Be honest.

Your team could continue to work on the same tasks using the same methods for a long time. How long? Exactly up to the very moment when…

Exactly up to the very moment when something changes. In that instant, you, as a manager, suddenly have a job. Management is about helping your team adapt to change. In fact, if nothing in your market, in your industry, in your state, in your town, with technology ever changes, then your company does not need you.

The more change you see in your market, in your industry, with technology, the more management you need. -TF

Fat Chance of an Idea

The response in the room was silence. Everyone counted, one, two, three, waiting for Jeanine to nod her head indicating that the discussion over. Today would be different.

The team knew that the less they contributed, the less they could be held accountable for. Jeanine would describe an issue or a problem, and then ask for ideas. No one ever had any ideas. No ideas meant no accountability. The team was not doing this on purpose. Most counterproductive thinking is done unconsciously.

Productive thinking requires conscious thought. It most often happens by design, rarely happens by chance. Jeanine’s statement of the issue played right into the hands of chance. “The customer is complaining that their product is always late, even though they know it was manufactured by the deadline. Does anyone have any ideas?” Chance of an idea? Fat chance.

We changed Jeanine’s question by simply making it more specific. “In what ways can we move the customer’s product from our manufacturing floor to the staging area and onto the truck in less time?” Suddenly, there were seven ideas.

Productive thinking happens by design. Make your question more specific. You will get more ideas. -TF