Category Archives: Accountability

Who is the Bad Guy Here?

As the team left the room, Mandy had a sinking feeling in the pit of her stomach. There had been lots of promises, but in her heart, she knew that only 10% of the elements on the project would be complete. It was almost as if Mandy should stand on a chair and scream at the top of her lungs, “I really, really mean it this time. We have to get this stuff done.”

Those of us who have children know the futility of standing on chairs and demanding. It is pretty entertaining for the children, but hardly effective.

In what way could Mandy create an atmosphere that would drive higher performance toward the goals set by the team? If standing on chairs and screaming doesn’t do it, what does? Most Managers are not aware of or do not leverage team accountability. Managers assume the role of the bad guy and essentially let the team off the hook when it comes to holding each other accountable for performance.

Turn the tables. In your next meeting, when a team member reports non-performance or underperformance, stop the agenda. Ask each team member to take a piece of paper and write down how this underperformance is impacting their part of the project. Go around the table and ask each person to make a statement. Then ask the team to create an expectation of how the underperformance should be corrected. Go around the table again. Finally, ask the underperformer to respond to the team and make a public commitment to action.

Team accountability is a very powerful dynamic. -TF

Fernando’s Mistake

Fernando was in a quandary. His newest team member, Paul, made a major mistake on a batch run that was due for shipping this afternoon. QC had pulled a sample, then more samples, eventually, the whole batch.

It was time for an accountability conversation. Fernando knew that Paul was inexperienced, yet showed great promise with a terrific attitude. The mistake would cost about $3,000 in scrap and another $1000 in re-run time. Paul had a great attitude, but this clearly could not happen again.

How was Fernando to talk to Paul without creating defensiveness? How to make sure that Paul would not repeat the behavior again? A passing comment would not work, light-heartedness would not communicate the seriousness of the situation.

Fernando decided to talk about a mistake that he once made. By talking about his own mistake, he could go really deep; describe the details, the consequences, the corrective action. He could talk about emotions, impact on the team, accepting responsibility. By talking about himself, Fernando could lay it all out, without creating a defensive response from Paul.

If Paul does not get defensive, is there a greater likelihood that he will actually take corrective action, change his behavior? -TF

P.S. Join Executive Management Online. Orientation now open, Session One opens in 2 days.

Out of the Fall Line

In the sport of snow skiing, control is achieved by counter-intuitive thinking. As speed increases, and the skier becomes “out of control,” conventional thinking causes the skier to lean backwards. This disastrous response moves the front edges of the skis off of the snow creating less control and increasing speed. The counter-intuitive response is to shift the body-weight forward, creating leverage on the front edges of the skis, giving the skier the ability to turn out of the fall line, resulting in skier control and a decrease of speed.

I see many managers attempting to gain “control” of their teams using force, command and control, threat of firing. Those of us with children know the futility of these efforts. The counter intuitive response is to ask questions instead of telling, to ask for commitment instead of demanding. It takes more time, requires more patience and has a longer lasting impact. Sometimes it even works with children. -TF

P.S. Join Executive Management Online. Orientation now open, Session One opens in 3 days.

Public Commitment

The meeting was almost over. I could see butts in chairs beginning to shift toward the door.

“Take this 3×5 index card and write your name on it. Below that, write down the one thing you are going to do in the next week based on what we talked about, today.” The puzzled faces gave way to ideas for action and the writing began. Forty-five seconds later, we started around the table, each in turn, in front of the group, making a public commitment.

At the end of each meeting, there is an anabolic window that most managers never take advantage of. This window is a short period of time in which growth occurs. Ten minutes later, the window is gone.

Public commitment to action. You have had your team engaged for the past twenty minutes in a meeting about improving the work-flow process. At the end of the meeting, you could adjourn and lose the window, or you could stop and ask for a public commitment to action. It could be the most powerful three minutes of the meeting.

Oh, bring your 3×5 card to the meeting next Monday. We want to know how you did. -TF

P.S. Join Executive Management Online. Orientation now open, Session One opens in 4 days.

Blaming and Whining

“I’m the manager. I’m in the best position to make the judgment about pace and quality?” Gail stood firm. “I can’t have the fox watching the hen-house.”

“You are correct. Never hire a fox to watch the hen-house. Only problem is, this isn’t a hen-house. This is your team. You have worked with some members of this team for five years. Your newest recruit, you have worked with for three months. You know who they are,” I replied.

“Yes, but I am still the manager. I am responsible for their productivity. No passing the buck here. The last manager in this position had to learn that lesson the hard way,” Gail explained.

“What lesson was that?” I was curious.

“Well, he didn’t hold his team accountable, on one hand, but blamed them for their lack of productivity. In fact, it sounded more like whining than blaming. My boss couldn’t take it anymore, and that was that.”

“So, what are you going to do differently?”