Category Archives: Accountability

The True Scope

“So, it helps to understand Julie’s job,” I observed. Eduardo and I had been talking about how attaching Time Span to each task in a job, helped to understand the scope of the job.

An epiphany was occurring inside Eduardo’s head. “Yeah, think about freight,” he started. “Hector is our freight supervisor, and his area is a mess.”

“How so?”

“Well, he usually gets all the day’s shipments out. It’s a big job, because we have to carefully crate everything. That’s part of the problem, often our crates don’t hold up and our product gets damaged in transit. We have close to ten freight claims going at any one time.

“Hector thinks he is responsible for one day’s work each day, when the Time Span required is much longer. He should also be responsible for investigating and resolving all of these freight claims, figuring out which of our crate components failed, and making changes to the process to reduce transit damage. He needs to work with our vendors to buy different crate components that do a better job. All of that seems to get lost in the shuffle, but it is really Hector’s responsibility. Instead of a one-day Time Span, his job is more like a one-month Time Span. He has some serious follow-up to do.

“It is only when I describe the job’s Time Span as one month that I begin to see the true scope of the job.”

The Whole Job

“I never thought of it that way,” said Eduardo.

“What do you mean?” I asked.

“Trying to attach Time Span to specific tasks in a person’s job,” he explained.

“What do you think about it?”

“I never really thought about the person’s whole job. When I start to attach Time Span to the separate tasks in a job, my understanding of the job gets a lot larger.”

“Give me an example,” I prompted.

“Okay, one of my supervisors, Julie, is responsible for scheduling. On the face of it, she needs to sit down and write out the schedule once a week. It takes 45 minutes to an hour depending on the work we have in house. If the schedule gets messed up, you know, someone gets sick, or the volume of work increases, Julie throws up her hands. She is quick to blame the circumstance and says she did her job, she put the schedule together last Friday.”

I smiled as Eduardo continued.

“So, scheduling is not something with a Time Span of one hour. Scheduling has a Time Span of three weeks. That’s how far in advance that we schedule.

“When I explain it to Julie, we need to talk about the Time Span. We publish the schedule each Friday, but she needs to be planning, for real, three weeks into the future. She needs to check the incoming work mix, scheduled machine maintenance and vacation schedules for the upcoming three weeks. Materials, machines and people for the upcoming three weeks.

“And when there is a change in the schedule, she needs to recalculate everything, three weeks into the future. By attaching Time Span to the task, now, I can see the whole job.”

If You Can Find It

From the Ask Tom Mailbag:

Question:
You seem to make a big deal between a Job Description and a Performance Contract. Other than the name, what’s the difference?

Response:
Most job descriptions simply list the tasks and activities related to the job. It is important to know what to do in your job. But it is also important to know how well something should be done and when something should be done.

It is only when we specifically describe the results, that people clearly understand the expectations of the job.

So, how do we know when we have clearly stated the results. I use the Q-tip criteria. QQT. Quantity, Quality over Time. When I state the results in terms of a specific Quantity of something at a given Quality standard over a specific period of Time, there is a great likelihood that the expectation is clear.

Look at your own Job Description (if you can find it) and see if it describes Results. -TF

Squirming Out of Accountability

“A Performance Contract?” asked Ron. We had been talking about Miguel, a newly promoted manager.

“Yes, a Performance Contract,” I replied. “Miguel may have had a job description when he started here as a supervisor, but now that he has been promoted, you haven’t clearly stated his new expectations. Part of his being overwhelmed is that he doesn’t know exactly what is expected.”

“But I am sure we have a job description written, somewhere, for his position,” Ron explained, trying to cover.

“Yes, but here is the difference. A job description is a document that describes what you would like Miguel to do. It’s a one-way street. A Performance Contract is a document that you have to sit down and hammer out. It is an agreement that requires commitment from both sides.

“People will always squirm out of general accountabilities based on a job description. It is much more difficult to squirm out of clear expectations spelled out in a Performance Contract.” -TF

The Performance Contract

“He is in a bit over his head,” Ron explained. “Miguel has been with the company for three years, now. He was promoted to manager about six weeks ago. I just don’t know if he is cut out for the job.”

“What does his behavior tell you?” I asked.

“It’s funny. All of a sudden, he has become defensive about things. When he misses a deadline, and he has missed a few lately, instead of owning up, taking responsibility, he gets angry, blaming this or that. Because he gets angry, people around him back away and let him off the hook.”

“What do you think would improve his feeling of being overwhelmed with his new job?”

Ron had to think on this one. Finally, he shook his head, not sure, “He just needs to get organized.”

“And how do you organize yourself in a new job?”

“I don’t know,” started Ron. “Something to help you remember all the things you are responsible for?”

“And what do you call that?” I pressed. “You have one. At some point, your boss sat down with you and hammered one out.”

“You mean, my job description?” Ron stopped. “Come to think of it, Miguel has been working for the past six weeks without one.”

“Okay, now I want you to change the name of Miguel’s job description. From now on, I want you to call it a Performance Contract. Before we meet again, I want you to sit down with Miguel and hammer out his Performance Contract.” -TF

In the Ditch

Phillip’s team looked at each other, across the table, and for the first time saw something different. No more were they simply co-workers, but now interdependent members of a group whose success depended on those connections.

We were talking about changing habits.

“No one succeeds by themselves,” I said. “At least for anything of significance. Sure you can think you are the Lone Ranger and prance around like you are someone important, but to achieve anything of real significance, you need a team. Each of you will, at some point, stumble, make a mistake, misjudge a situation. Each of you will, at some point, become discouraged, or become a Prima Dona, full of yourself.

“And when that happens, you will not recognize it in yourself, soon enough. You need each other to tell you those things, to make each of you better. Without each other, you will end up in ditch somewhere and no one will notice.” -TF

___
Our next Leadership Program begins in Fort Lauderdale on February 26. We have one seat available. For more information, visit www.workingleadership.com.

Owning the Truth

Miriam was calm. She had just confronted a bully.

“Interesting,” I responded, “that you talked about your contribution to the problem. You said that the problem persisted, in part, because you had never confronted her, because you lacked the courage.

“As her manager, doesn’t this show weakness?” I knew this was a critical question for Miriam to understand as she moved to the next step with her team member. She had acted swiftly, but with purpose.

“No, it did not show weakness,” she replied. “It was the truth. Owning up to the truth is not an act of weakness. More important, accepting responsibility is the first step to change. Until I own up to the truth, until I understand the behavior is mine, I cannot change my behavior.

“My team member is in the same position. She also has to change. Her first step will be to own up to the truth and take responsibility for her own behavior. As long as she thinks it is someone else’s fault, she can never take the first step to change.”

___
Our next Leadership Program in Fort Lauderdale begins February 26, 2007. Visit www.workingleadership.com.

What Do You Stand For?

Miriam looked wide eyed as she explained what had happened. “I know I should have confronted the behavior straight away, but I didn’t. And now, she thinks it’s okay to be snotty and nasty to people when she doesn’t get her way.”

“How long has this been going on?” I asked. Miriam stopped. She didn’t want to tell me.

“Well, it pretty much started the first month she was here.” Silence. “Okay, about a year and a half.”

“And you haven’t spoken to her about her behavior?”

“At first I thought she was just having a bad day, then it turned into a bad week, then a bad month. By then, nobody wanted to go near her for fear she would rip their head off.”

“That bad?”

Miriam pursed her lips, looking sideways. “Well, not that bad, but she is just plain mean to people around her.”

“And what does your team think about the way you have handled it?”

“Oh, they must think I am very frustrated with her,” Miriam explained. “They know I am just afraid to say anything, even though I am the manager.”

“I don’t think so.” I lowered my eyes to look directly at Miriam. “After a while, you begin to stand for what you tolerate.” -TF

Only Work One Day a Week

“I know I have to work differently,” Sharon stammered. “I just can’t seem to get everything done. I am pretty frustrated.”

“Sharon, what would you do differently, if I only allowed you to work one day per week?”

She chuckled at the prospect of the idea. “No, way!”

I lifted my eyes and slowly nodded my head up and down. “Think about it. Describe to me what you would do if you came in Monday morning and knew that your team had to work the rest of the week without you?”

Sharon looked down, then up to the left. “I guess I would meet with each one of my supervisors and make sure they knew what needed to get done that week.”

“And what else?”

“Well, I would ask them if they knew of any problems that would prevent them from getting the job done.”

“And knowing that you would not be there to solve the problem for them that week, how would you discuss the issue?”

“Well, we would probably talk about what they would have to do if the problem actually happened, or maybe how to prevent the problem.”

“So, tell me, Sharon. Which one of your team members could you have that discussion with today?” -TF

All Crumbs Lead Back to the Manager

I am a bit overwhelmed with the quality of responses to the dilemma posted by Exhausted this past Friday. If you are an email subscriber, you should visit the site to read the comments. There are some very thoughtful suggestions at both ends of the spectrum.

Recap:
Exhausted is faced with a decision about a direct report who is resistant to his management of her work behavior. Last Friday’s post has the details.

My response:
As I listened to your description of events, I only heard about your efforts and your failure to manage this person to your way of thinking and behavior.

People don’t want to be managed. You can manage a process, you can manage a machine, but you cannot manage a person. Which is kind of weird, because we think that is what managers are supposed to do.

People don’t want to be managed, but they will follow a leader. If you take your manager hat off for a bit and replace it with your leader hat, what would you do differently?

You see, the only way to manage people is with pressure tactics, control systems, threats of punishment, job descriptions, verbal and written warnings. You have tried all of these and you are left with a poor attitude and a resistant direct report.

But with your leader hat on, what are the new tools you have to build trust and gain commitment. People will sign-on to a world that they help to construct.

Here is the bad news. For the past four months, you have managed this person into a state of resistance. You may have ruined her. And you may not have the patience or the time to repair the damage. And the damage may not be repairable.

By all appearances, this person may be headed for an inevitable separation. And separations happen. You will then get a chance with a new person. As a manager (leader), you will get a second chance. Take a look at your hat, make sure you are wearing the right one. Whenever I hear about this kind of situation, all crumbs lead back to the manager. That would be you. -TF