Category Archives: Motivation

Everyone Got Pumped Up

“So, if, for the moment, we put aside bonus and incentives, tell me, how do you bring out the best in people?” asked Jamie.

“You tell me,” I replied. “What kinds of things have you tried, besides bonus and incentives?”

Jamie had to stop and think. Slowly she retrieved an idea her company had tried in the past. “Quality Circles,” she floated. “A couple of years ago, we tried Quality Circles.”

“And how did that work out?”

“Well, it seemed okay, for a while. Everyone got pumped up, we had some meetings. Some of the meetings generated some quality improvements. Is that bringing out the best in people?” she asked.

“It’s a start. What happened to the program?”

“I don’t know. It just sort of died. We got busy, skipped a couple of meetings, before you knew it, we were off the wagon.”
___
In the past, what kind of programs has your company tried, to bring out the best in people? Over the long haul, how did they work out? -TF

Bringing Out the Best in People

For the past two weeks, we have been talking about bonus and incentive systems, how they work, how they don’t work, issues of accountability. I have had more questions, emails and posted comments than any other time since we started this blog.

But we’re done. Change the subject. Because all these histrionics about bonus and incentive systems all scream at the following question. When all is said and all is done,

How do we bring out the best in people?

Next week, we will re-focus the discussion on that central question. Meanwhile, how do you bring out the best in your people? -TF

We still have three seats left in our Leadership program that begins next Wednesday in Fort Lauderdale. If you are thinking about putting someone into that program, please reply to this email or visit www.workingleadership.com. -TF

No One Can Be Wrong

“How could you create an environment of trust, where, no matter the contribution, it was accepted and valued?” I repeated.

Reggie was stumped, at least for the moment. I think it was more that he didn’t think this kind of conversation was possible with his team.

“Reggie, what if you opened the meeting with something like this, a Good News exercise? Go around the room and have each person describe something good that had happened to them in the past week, business or personal.”

Reggie began to stare at the right hand corner of the ceiling, making a picture in his mind.

I broke his concentration. “What do you accomplish with an exercise like that?” I asked.

Reggie’s head began to slowly nod, then he spoke. “Okay, first everybody participates. Second, no one can be wrong.”

“Exactly, that’s where we start.” -TF

Accepted and Valued

Great comments yesterday from Dean and Prices on Reggie’s Challenge.
___

“So, Reggie, here is my challenge to you. In what way can you get your managers to talk about those behaviors instead of you?”

“But I’m the manager,” Reggie protested. “I thought I was the one to set the direction. I thought I was the one to give the marching orders. I thought it was my responsibility to tell them what to do. It’s my responsibility to manage them.”

“Reggie, people don’t want to be managed. People want to be lead. It is your responsibility to set the direction, but from there, your role becomes leadership. How do you get people to think? How do you get people to consider different alternatives? How do you get people talking?”

Reggie was quick to respond, “That’s easy. You just ask them questions. But I have tried that before and most times, I don’t get any response.”

“And why don’t you get a response. What’s the problem? What’s going on the mind of your team member?”

“Well,” Reggie started, “sometimes they just don’t have anything to say, and sometimes they are afraid to say anything.”

“Where does that fear come from?” I continued.

Reggie stopped. “I guess they don’t want to be wrong.”

“How could you change that? How could you create an environment of trust, where no matter the contribution, it was accepted and valued?” -TF

The First Change

“So, you tell me. What could we do differently to get the behaviors we want that drive the results that we want?” Reggie insisted.

“You already have the first two steps,” I began. “The first thing you did was define the purpose for the program. You said the purpose to keep your managers focused on the company’s goals and to engage in behaviors to create those results.” Reggie nodded his head in agreement.

“Your second step was to communicate those behaviors you identified to drive the results you wanted, right? You did that in your individual KRA meetings.” Reggie continued to nod his head.

“So, if you didn’t have the bonus program, in two cases you would have achieved the results you wanted anyway?” More nods.

“And if you didn’t have the bonus program, three of your managers would not have spent counterproductive time trying to game your gross margin system?

“And if you didn’t have the bonus program, two more of your managers would not have become discouraged halfway through the quarter?”

“Okay, I’m with you,” Reggie interrupted. “But, what can I do differently, to make sure I get the behaviors I want?”

“Every week, you sat down with each manager and reviewed the behaviors you wanted, right? And each week, each manager promised to try very hard to do what you talked about, yes?”

“Yes.”

“So, stop talking about it. You stop talking about those behaviors.” Reggie looked puzzled. I continued, “The wrong person is doing all the talking. You stop talking. Your managers need to be talking about this stuff, not you. The first thing that needs to change is who is doing the talking.

“So, Reggie, here is my challenge to you. In what way can you get your managers to talk about those behaviors instead of you?” -TF

Getting Behaviors That Drive Results

Last week, based on a number of conversations I had with Reggie, we started a heated debate about incentives and bonus compensation. Reggie’s experience had backfired on him.

“So, tell me Reggie, what exactly were you trying to accomplish with the bonus system? Because that is where we have start our discussion. What was the purpose?” I asked.

“The purpose, well, you know. I want my managers to stay focused, to have the company’s best interest at heart, to take that one more phone call before going home,” Reggie replied.

“And how did you communicate this to each of your managers?”

“Well, once a year, we sit down and look at their job. We break it down into Key Result Areas, then create a goal in each area, for the year. We attach dollars to each of the goals, to be paid quarterly. We are doing it just the way our consultant told us to do it.”

“And what are the results?”

“It’s all over the board. Two managers made most of their KRAs, but I don’t think they did anything special, it just happened. Three other managers did some suspect things to manipulate the numbers into the last quarter, so they got their bonus, but, they didn’t really achieve the goal, it just looked like it. And two other managers, well, they missed their targets, in fact, they quit trying about halfway through the quarter.” Reggie stopped. He didn’t like his own expert opinion on this.

“So, by your assessment, the bonus program achieved results in two cases, but you figure those results would have occurred with or without a bonus program. And in five other cases, the bonus program created manipulation or became a disincentive to performance,” I restated.

“Yes, that’s it. So, you tell me. What could we do differently to get the behaviors we want that drive the results that we want?”

Throwing Money

The past few days discussion on the impact of bonuses has stirred quite a bit of email and posted comments.

Bonus systems are seductive for both the manager and the direct report. They sound great when times are good, the manager can relax accountability efforts (seduced by the good times). But when times are not so good, things turn sour.

It all comes back to the contract. As a manager, I expect my team members to do their best every day. In exchange, they can count on consistent fair compensation.

The last email I received posed this simple question. “What type of incentive program would you recommend over a bonus program?”

It’s a sucker punch question. Incentives hearken back to the carrot and stick. Incentives and bonuses create distrust and the circumstance for manipulation. Incentives and bonuses say “I do not trust you to do your best.”

So, what type of incentive program? It’s the incentive program of trust. Next week, we will talk about its elements, and how a manager has real influence in the areas of motivation and performance. Rather than just throwing money at it. -TF

At Risk

From the Ask Tom mailbag:

In response to my discussions over the past few days with Reggie over incentive (bonus) compensation.

Question:

I understand in this situation that the Manager specifically stated that he was holding back compensation and distributing it as bonuses because he did not trust his people to stay motivated, but is it your belief that bonuses are typically a bad idea. My work is strictly commission, payment for outcomes, and from what I’ve read, this is one of the best compensation systems so that you stay real in your work and don’t become complacent. It keeps me in touch with the results that I aim to achieve and prevents me from hitting a ceiling on my earnings. While I was salaried, I was probably still one of the highest achievers, but I bet I work even harder now. What do you think?

Response:

Most incentive, or bonus systems create distrust, as Reggie is experiencing. Reggie would attempt to describe the system in more positive terms, like a reward for “extra” effort, but the net effect is still the same. It violates the contract that a person would give their best effort every day.

That being said, there are circumstances where people are genuinely motivated by compensation “at risk.” You do not want to see a cap on your earnings. You have the entrepreneurial spirit and are willing to take your lumps by your results even when things don’t pan out. Sales roles and the people in those roles are often in this circumstance. I see this relationship, not as a W-2 employee under a destructive, manipulated bonus plan, but as a 1099 independent contractor who truly wants to live at risk. This risk and this relationship is perfectly appropriate for this circumstance.

Let’s hear your thoughts. -TF

Environment of Distrust

Reggie looked at me sideways. “Do you mean that this whole complicated issue regarding incentive compensation, that we hired expensive consultants to help us with, may be a guided misadventure?”

“You tell me,” I replied. “What type of environment do you create when you tell people that you are holding back part of their compensation because you don’t trust them to do their best?”

“You just said it, it creates an environment of distrust,” Reggie declared.

“And what kind of behavior does this distrust create?”

“Whooo! It’s all over the board. Some people work really hard, appear very dedicated and some people try to figure out how to manipulate the system to their advantage. I don’t know. Come to think of it, the people who seem committed, who perform the best, are the kind of people who would work very diligently even without the bonus.”

“And would you describe those people as stupid for working so hard without having a bonus as a carrot?”

Reggie shook his head. “No. I would have to say that is just who those people are. The words are –dependable-integrity-earnest.”

“So, what do you think this incentive plan is accomplishing?” -TF

Why Bonuses?

“How else are you supposed to motivate people?” Reggie asked. “I look around at what other companies do and bonus systems are used almost everywhere.”

“Why do you think bonuses are used in most companies as a motivation tool?” I asked.

“Well, I just don’t know of any other way to get people to go the extra mile, to give their best effort,” Reggie defended.

“I think you have your answer.”

Reggie looked puzzled.

“That’s your answer,” I continued. “Most companies use bonus systems, because they don’t know any other ways to properly motivate their teams.” -TF