From the Ask Tom mailbag:
In response to my discussions over the past few days with Reggie over incentive (bonus) compensation.
Question:
I understand in this situation that the Manager specifically stated that he was holding back compensation and distributing it as bonuses because he did not trust his people to stay motivated, but is it your belief that bonuses are typically a bad idea. My work is strictly commission, payment for outcomes, and from what I’ve read, this is one of the best compensation systems so that you stay real in your work and don’t become complacent. It keeps me in touch with the results that I aim to achieve and prevents me from hitting a ceiling on my earnings. While I was salaried, I was probably still one of the highest achievers, but I bet I work even harder now. What do you think?
Response:
Most incentive, or bonus systems create distrust, as Reggie is experiencing. Reggie would attempt to describe the system in more positive terms, like a reward for “extra” effort, but the net effect is still the same. It violates the contract that a person would give their best effort every day.
That being said, there are circumstances where people are genuinely motivated by compensation “at risk.” You do not want to see a cap on your earnings. You have the entrepreneurial spirit and are willing to take your lumps by your results even when things don’t pan out. Sales roles and the people in those roles are often in this circumstance. I see this relationship, not as a W-2 employee under a destructive, manipulated bonus plan, but as a 1099 independent contractor who truly wants to live at risk. This risk and this relationship is perfectly appropriate for this circumstance.
Let’s hear your thoughts. -TF