Category Archives: Accountability

But, I Already Know

“If you had to describe the reason for Phillip’s termination, what would it be?” I asked.

Joyce shifted with the uncomfortable question. I had asked her to make a judgment about a team member’s underperformance. And I was looking for objective and measurable evidence.

“I think I would have to go back to his job description and start there,” she replied.

“And if you went back to the job description, what would you find?”

Joyce got up from her chair and paced to the side of the room. “First of all, I would have to find the job description, but I already know it is just a bunch of gobbledygook.”

“So, if I really put you to the test, as a manager, you are holding Phillip to a performance standard that you describe as gobbledygook?”

“Yes, but, I can still tell that he is not doing his job. He doesn’t have the capability. I know that, even without the job description.”

“So, how are we going to capture what you already know in measurable terms to help us? To help us know what to do with Phillip?” -TF

___
Our next Leadership class in Fort Lauderdale begins July 16. For more information, visit www.workingleadership.com. We have only four available seats left.

The Real Reason

“So, let’s look at your description of Phillip,” I prompted. “You said he is probably in over his head. What exactly does that mean?”

Joyce’s brow furrowed. “You know. He is having trouble cutting it. Can’t deliver. Doesn’t know whether to scream or eat a banana.”

I smiled. Nodded. “I know. I know exactly what you mean. But how do we characterize this behavior so we can improve the situation?”

Joyce looked a little sheepish. “I don’t mean to poke fun. But I really don’t know how else to put it.”

“So, let’s say you fire Phillip and your boss comes to you and wants to know the reason. Are you going to say the Phillip was terminated because he didn’t know whether to scream or eat a banana?”

“Of course not. I would have to think of something more tactful,” Joyce replied.

“Instead of something more tactful, I want you to think of something closer to the truth, something you can be objective about and measure.”

“I don’t know,” said Joyce, backpedaling.

“Yes, but if you did know, what would the reason be?” -TF

___
Our next Leadership program in Fort Lauderdale begins July 16. For more information and registration, go to www.workingleadership.com.

The True Scope

“So, it helps to understand Julie’s job,” I observed. Eduardo and I had been talking about how attaching Time Span to each task in a job, helped to understand the scope of the job.

An epiphany was occurring inside Eduardo’s head. “Yeah, think about freight,” he started. “Hector is our freight supervisor, and his area is a mess.”

“How so?”

“Well, he usually gets all the day’s shipments out. It’s a big job, because we have to carefully crate everything. That’s part of the problem, often our crates don’t hold up and our product gets damaged in transit. We have close to ten freight claims going at any one time.

“Hector thinks he is responsible for one day’s work each day, when the Time Span required is much longer. He should also be responsible for investigating and resolving all of these freight claims, figuring out which of our crate components failed, and making changes to the process to reduce transit damage. He needs to work with our vendors to buy different crate components that do a better job. All of that seems to get lost in the shuffle, but it is really Hector’s responsibility. Instead of a one-day Time Span, his job is more like a one-month Time Span. He has some serious follow-up to do.

“It is only when I describe the job’s Time Span as one month that I begin to see the true scope of the job.”

The Whole Job

“I never thought of it that way,” said Eduardo.

“What do you mean?” I asked.

“Trying to attach Time Span to specific tasks in a person’s job,” he explained.

“What do you think about it?”

“I never really thought about the person’s whole job. When I start to attach Time Span to the separate tasks in a job, my understanding of the job gets a lot larger.”

“Give me an example,” I prompted.

“Okay, one of my supervisors, Julie, is responsible for scheduling. On the face of it, she needs to sit down and write out the schedule once a week. It takes 45 minutes to an hour depending on the work we have in house. If the schedule gets messed up, you know, someone gets sick, or the volume of work increases, Julie throws up her hands. She is quick to blame the circumstance and says she did her job, she put the schedule together last Friday.”

I smiled as Eduardo continued.

“So, scheduling is not something with a Time Span of one hour. Scheduling has a Time Span of three weeks. That’s how far in advance that we schedule.

“When I explain it to Julie, we need to talk about the Time Span. We publish the schedule each Friday, but she needs to be planning, for real, three weeks into the future. She needs to check the incoming work mix, scheduled machine maintenance and vacation schedules for the upcoming three weeks. Materials, machines and people for the upcoming three weeks.

“And when there is a change in the schedule, she needs to recalculate everything, three weeks into the future. By attaching Time Span to the task, now, I can see the whole job.”

If You Can Find It

From the Ask Tom Mailbag:

Question:
You seem to make a big deal between a Job Description and a Performance Contract. Other than the name, what’s the difference?

Response:
Most job descriptions simply list the tasks and activities related to the job. It is important to know what to do in your job. But it is also important to know how well something should be done and when something should be done.

It is only when we specifically describe the results, that people clearly understand the expectations of the job.

So, how do we know when we have clearly stated the results. I use the Q-tip criteria. QQT. Quantity, Quality over Time. When I state the results in terms of a specific Quantity of something at a given Quality standard over a specific period of Time, there is a great likelihood that the expectation is clear.

Look at your own Job Description (if you can find it) and see if it describes Results. -TF

Squirming Out of Accountability

“A Performance Contract?” asked Ron. We had been talking about Miguel, a newly promoted manager.

“Yes, a Performance Contract,” I replied. “Miguel may have had a job description when he started here as a supervisor, but now that he has been promoted, you haven’t clearly stated his new expectations. Part of his being overwhelmed is that he doesn’t know exactly what is expected.”

“But I am sure we have a job description written, somewhere, for his position,” Ron explained, trying to cover.

“Yes, but here is the difference. A job description is a document that describes what you would like Miguel to do. It’s a one-way street. A Performance Contract is a document that you have to sit down and hammer out. It is an agreement that requires commitment from both sides.

“People will always squirm out of general accountabilities based on a job description. It is much more difficult to squirm out of clear expectations spelled out in a Performance Contract.” -TF

The Performance Contract

“He is in a bit over his head,” Ron explained. “Miguel has been with the company for three years, now. He was promoted to manager about six weeks ago. I just don’t know if he is cut out for the job.”

“What does his behavior tell you?” I asked.

“It’s funny. All of a sudden, he has become defensive about things. When he misses a deadline, and he has missed a few lately, instead of owning up, taking responsibility, he gets angry, blaming this or that. Because he gets angry, people around him back away and let him off the hook.”

“What do you think would improve his feeling of being overwhelmed with his new job?”

Ron had to think on this one. Finally, he shook his head, not sure, “He just needs to get organized.”

“And how do you organize yourself in a new job?”

“I don’t know,” started Ron. “Something to help you remember all the things you are responsible for?”

“And what do you call that?” I pressed. “You have one. At some point, your boss sat down with you and hammered one out.”

“You mean, my job description?” Ron stopped. “Come to think of it, Miguel has been working for the past six weeks without one.”

“Okay, now I want you to change the name of Miguel’s job description. From now on, I want you to call it a Performance Contract. Before we meet again, I want you to sit down with Miguel and hammer out his Performance Contract.” -TF

In the Ditch

Phillip’s team looked at each other, across the table, and for the first time saw something different. No more were they simply co-workers, but now interdependent members of a group whose success depended on those connections.

We were talking about changing habits.

“No one succeeds by themselves,” I said. “At least for anything of significance. Sure you can think you are the Lone Ranger and prance around like you are someone important, but to achieve anything of real significance, you need a team. Each of you will, at some point, stumble, make a mistake, misjudge a situation. Each of you will, at some point, become discouraged, or become a Prima Dona, full of yourself.

“And when that happens, you will not recognize it in yourself, soon enough. You need each other to tell you those things, to make each of you better. Without each other, you will end up in ditch somewhere and no one will notice.” -TF

___
Our next Leadership Program begins in Fort Lauderdale on February 26. We have one seat available. For more information, visit www.workingleadership.com.

Owning the Truth

Miriam was calm. She had just confronted a bully.

“Interesting,” I responded, “that you talked about your contribution to the problem. You said that the problem persisted, in part, because you had never confronted her, because you lacked the courage.

“As her manager, doesn’t this show weakness?” I knew this was a critical question for Miriam to understand as she moved to the next step with her team member. She had acted swiftly, but with purpose.

“No, it did not show weakness,” she replied. “It was the truth. Owning up to the truth is not an act of weakness. More important, accepting responsibility is the first step to change. Until I own up to the truth, until I understand the behavior is mine, I cannot change my behavior.

“My team member is in the same position. She also has to change. Her first step will be to own up to the truth and take responsibility for her own behavior. As long as she thinks it is someone else’s fault, she can never take the first step to change.”

___
Our next Leadership Program in Fort Lauderdale begins February 26, 2007. Visit www.workingleadership.com.

What Do You Stand For?

Miriam looked wide eyed as she explained what had happened. “I know I should have confronted the behavior straight away, but I didn’t. And now, she thinks it’s okay to be snotty and nasty to people when she doesn’t get her way.”

“How long has this been going on?” I asked. Miriam stopped. She didn’t want to tell me.

“Well, it pretty much started the first month she was here.” Silence. “Okay, about a year and a half.”

“And you haven’t spoken to her about her behavior?”

“At first I thought she was just having a bad day, then it turned into a bad week, then a bad month. By then, nobody wanted to go near her for fear she would rip their head off.”

“That bad?”

Miriam pursed her lips, looking sideways. “Well, not that bad, but she is just plain mean to people around her.”

“And what does your team think about the way you have handled it?”

“Oh, they must think I am very frustrated with her,” Miriam explained. “They know I am just afraid to say anything, even though I am the manager.”

“I don’t think so.” I lowered my eyes to look directly at Miriam. “After a while, you begin to stand for what you tolerate.” -TF