Author Archives: Tom Foster

About Tom Foster

Tom Foster spends most of his time talking with managers and business owners. The conversations are about business lives and personal lives, goals, objectives and measuring performance. In short, transforming groups of people into teams working together. Sometimes we make great strides understanding this management stuff, other times it’s measured in very short inches. But in all of this conversation, there are things that we learn. This blog is that part of the conversation I can share. Often, the names are changed to protect the guilty, but this is real life inside of real companies.

Effectiveness and Decisions

“Your goal is to make it all happen according to your schedule?” I continued. “Sounds easy. Can’t you just make up a schedule and tell everyone they have to follow it?”

Taylor chuckled and shook his head. “I wish. No, my schedule has to meet the Contractor’s schedule and it has to mesh with all the sub-trades on the job. And most importantly, my schedule has to be tight enough to match the budget and man-hours in our original estimate. There are a thousand things that have to go right. By the way, we have 30 other projects that will happen during this same twenty two months.”

“So, let’s talk about the decisions that go along with your goal. Every role has decisions that must be made. That’s the work that must be done. Your effectiveness in managing this schedule depends on the decisions that you make. When I look at the Time Span of your Goals, I also look at the Time Span of your decisions, the Time Span of Discretion.” -TF

According to Schedule

“Tell me, what is your longest Time Span goal?” I asked.

Taylor sat across the conference table. He was in charge of project scheduling. At any given time, his company has 30-35 projects in play. Some of the projects only last 4-5 weeks. Others last 12-15 months. Yet, every project is important. No details can be dropped, no matter how small.

“What do you mean?” Taylor asked. “I mean, I work with a Project Management software. I spend time meeting with all the Project Managers, looking at their contracts, their change orders, the deadlines in their project segments.”

“What is your longest project?”

“The longest one, is the Phoenix project. We got the contract last week. I have already been looking at it for a couple of months though, ever since it came through our estimating department. It’s a big project and we had to see if we could even mobilize to do it. Twenty two months it will take.”

“And what is the Goal, what is your Goal?” I asked.

“At the end of the project, all of the materials showed at the job site, all the crews showed up to do the production. The equipment required, whether we own it, or rented it, was on-site. All the trades that we had to coordinate with, everything happened according to my schedule. That’s my goal.”

Judgment and Decision Making

The other day I checked to see how many posts I had tagged related to Time Span. The number was 153. Time Span, as a concept, comes from the most basic thing we do, as a company, the most fundamental thing we do, as managers. Time Span comes from Goal Setting.

What is a goal? Take all the ornaments off. A goal is a “what by when.” Often, we focus on the “what” and rarely pay much attention to the “by when.” But it is the “by when” of every goal that determines the Time Span.

Time Span is the length of time a person works into the future, without direction, using their own discretionary judgment to achieve a specific goal.

Three weeks ago, fifteen of you, began work in our online platform (www.workingleadership.com). The first Subject Area was Goal Setting and Time Span. The discussion now shifts its attention from the Goal to Discretionary Judgment.

In the pursuit of any goal, we have to make decisions. We make those decisions using our discretionary judgment. The Time Span of the Goal (the “by when”) has a direct relationship to the Time Span of Discretion.

An important discussion, for managers, surrounds the decisions that must be made to achieve a specific goal.

What is your most important goal? What are the decisions you have to make to achieve that goal?

Join the Conversation
You can join the conversation at any time. We have 8 week subscriptions and annual subscriptions. Follow this link – www.workingleadership.com.

The Only Person in Position

“But everyone understood that we had to land the project for the team to get their bonus,” Lindsey protested.

“No, you understood that. The team understood something different. If they gave it their best and worked really hard, the team would get the bonus. So, they worked really hard and gave it their best. The only person who was in position to make decisions was the manager. The team didn’t get their bonus because of their manager.”

Lindsey was quiet. “So, we set up a system that, in the end, created a divide between the manager and the team.”

Working Leadership Online Update
Our next subject area – Decision Making – Facts and Intuition begins Monday. For registration, visit www.workingleadership.com

The Best Intentions

Lindsey had a puzzled look on her face. “I don’t understand. The team missed the deadline. We lost the project. If not the team, who do we hold accountable for the result? And believe me, this was a big deal. There was a big team bonus riding on this project.”

I started, slowly. “Who knew about the project first? Who had knowledge about the context of the project among all the other projects in the company? Who had the ability to allocate additional personnel to the project team to meet the deadline? Who had the authority to bump other project schedules to meet this deadline? Who was in a position to authorize overtime for this project?”

“Well, the Memphis team Manager,” she replied.

Working Leadership Online Update
Our next subject area – Decision Making – Facts and Intuition begins Monday. For registration, visit www.workingleadership.com

Missed a Deadline

“I don’t see it,” Lindsey grimaced. “As a company, it is certainly not our intention to pit management against team members.”

“Yet, you feel a growing divide, and you are blaming the economy,” I replied.

“Well, yes, if it weren’t for the economy, I don’t think this would happen.”

“Let’s take a look at managerial accountability. Who do you hold accountable for the output of any of your teams? They have a goal, the goal is not reached. Who do you hold accountable?”

“You’re right. Just last week, our Memphis project team missed a deadline that cost us the opportunity to land a project. It wasn’t my team, but anyone could see from a couple of weeks before, that they weren’t going to meet the time constraints.”

“Who did you hold accountable for missing the deadline?” I asked.

“Well, it was the Memphis project team.”

“Wrong, it’s not the team we should hold accountable for the result.” -TF

Working Against Ourselves

“What’s at stake here?” I asked. “You seem disturbed by this growing divide in your company, this sense of distrust. Though you may blame it on the economy, the seeds were sown long ago. You didn’t see them, but the trust between managers and team members has always been troublesome. That’s why there are so many consultants and books on management.”

Lindsey grinned. “So, what can I say? What can I do, as a Manager, to create a higher level of trust?”

“I want to drive this discussion deeper,” I started. “Because I am not sure if there is anything you can say that speaks louder than the managerial systems in your company.”

“What do you mean, managerial systems? I mean, I know what a system is. But, do you mean we have systems that create distrust?”

“It’s possible,” I nodded. “Many companies, with the best of intentions, create people systems that work against, precisely, what they are trying to achieve.”

Breaking the Divide

“With this economy, I feel there is a growing lack of trust inside our company. There seems to be a growing divide between management and everyone else,” Lindsey described.

“What do you see, that makes you say that?” I asked.

“Sometimes I think it is just grumbling in the hallway, conversations in the breakroom. I think people are withdrawing, looking out for themselves.”

“People are always governed by their own self-interest. What is different now?”

“It’s just an uneasy feeling I have,” Lindsey replied. “I mean, I know we have had to make some adjustments, some layoffs, some of us, including me, have even taken pay cuts. It’s been a tough time.”

“What can we do, intentionally, consistently, to create an environment where trust can have a chance?” -TF

Time Span and the End of the Story

“I don’t understand,” Roger shook his head. “If Brad would just start earlier on these longer projects, things would be under control, and he wouldn’t be cutting unnecessary corners which compromise project quality.”

“Why do you think he procrastinates until the end?” I asked.

Roger shook his head.

“Because,” I continued, “he cannot see the end until he is two months away. On a project with a nine month deadline, Brad cannot see the end. It is too far away. There is so much uncertainty between now and nine months from now, that he cannot see it.

“So he takes no action.

“Of course, the pressure of the project builds, because now things are getting late, but even that is not what finally kicks Brad into action. With sixty days to go, Brad can now see the end. And when Brad can see the end, he starts to act. It is frustrating for us, because we saw this nine months ago.

“Everyone has a story. And every story has a beginning, middle and an end. When you listen to someone’s story, you will hear the Time Span of their story. They cannot take action in their story until they see the end of their story.”

Procrastination, Then Overtime

I managed to get two steps up the food chain, talking with the boss of Olivia’s boss, a senior vice president in the company.

“So, how did the audit project get delayed for your ISO re-certification?” I asked.

“I don’t know. You spoke with Olivia, one of our supervisors. Her manager, Brad, is really in charge of that project, it’s a Stratum III role, and we have had more troubles than just the audit with Brad.”

“Procrastination?” I suggested.

His eyes grew wide and his head began to nod in agreement. Eyebrows furrowed. “Yes. And I have talked to him about getting a jump on these longer term projects. Brad is okay with projects of about 60 days, but anything longer than that and he really gets in the weeds. In the end, you start to see him power through, working overtime and weekends. When he started working here, he looked really dedicated, but as time goes on, I don’t see that as effective manager behavior.”

“What length project is Brad good at?”

“Two months.”

“And how much time is left before the audit?”

“Two months.”

“What connection can you make from that?” -TF