It’s New, It’s Wierd

Leave a reply

“I was one of the guys, now I am their manager,” said Jeremy. “I mean, I know what to do, it just feels weird.”

“Tell me about it.” I ask.

“Well, on Friday, we used to always go out for happy hour. Now, I am holding back. Maybe I will show up once a month after work, but I will usually only stay for one beer, then I beg off and hit the road.”

“What’s changed about the relationships?”

Jeremy took his time to respond. “I guess, instead of a friend, the relationship is one of accountability. I mean, it’s okay to be friendly, but sometimes you have to hold the line, sometimes you have to confront, sometimes the conversation is difficult.” He stopped. “And sometimes you feel by yourself.”

“So, who can you hang out with now?”

“Well, now, it’s the other managers in the company. They have all been supportive. It is a different perspective. I’m the new kid on the block.”

“And what about your old team, from when you were a supervisor?”

“They are still under me, but now I work through their new supervisor. That relationship, it’s not accountability anymore, not with me. Now, it’s more like a mentor relationship. It’s a longer view. Instead of me, telling them what to do, I do more observing. Their new supervisor is more concerned with their day to day productivity. I am actually looking for the one that will emerge as the next supervisor in another year.”

“Why do you think all this feels weird?” I ask.

“It’s new,” said Jeremy. “My role is different. I never thought there was this much difference between being a supervisor and being a manager.” -TF

Value of Accountability

Leave a reply

“If you are not a psychologist, how do you interview a person for values?” I asked. This conversation started with a post a couple of days ago, but now, I am sitting with Norman, who is working on precisely this issue.

“We have used those profile things before, but I find as soon as I get someone to take the test, the entire hiring decision gets based on it. The hiring manager is always scared to go against the test. I would love to know how to interview someone for their value system,” said Norman.

“First, you have to play to your strength as a manager, someone who knows the difference between positive behavior and negative behavior. What value would you like to interview for?”

“How about, taking responsibility for your own performance, owning up to your mistakes. I guess the value is accountability,” replied Norman.

“You have already completed the first step,” I said. “When you described the value of accountability, you gave an example of a behavior, owning up to your own mistakes. That is the first step in interviewing for a value, translating it into a behavior. Once it is a behavior we can interview for it. Here is how it sounds.

“Tell me about a time, in your position, working on a project, where a mistake was made. How was the mistake discovered? What impact did the mistake have on the project? How was the mistake explained to the customer (or the manager)? How was the mistake rectified? What was learned from the mistake?

“All of the questions will lead you directly to the value of accountability, yet they are asked from a management perspective (rather than a psychological perspective). Play to your strength as a manager.” -TF

Interviewing for Fit

Leave a reply

From the Ask Tom mailbag.

Question

When you talked about interviewing for “fit” with our company culture, you said that we should interview for behaviors. I understand what you mean, but I don’t know what the questions sound like.

Response

Creating the interview questions for candidate traits like fit, values and attitude just takes a couple of steps. First, we have to translate the warm fuzzy into a behavior. Let’s start with “fit,” since that is the one you asked about.

Ask yourself the question, “How does a person who fits our culture behave?”

I work with a company that has a real sense of urgency in everything they do. People show up to work early, they start projects early, they return phone calls quickly, they turn paperwork around fast. It is a real culture of “gitter done.” People without that sense of urgency don’t last long at this company. It is an important area to interview for.

So, step two is to ask the person about those critical behaviors. Here is how it sounds.

Tell me about the working hours at the XYZ company? In your position, what time did you arrive for work? In your position, what was the most productive time for you?

In your position, what kind of customer interaction did you have? How many phone calls per day did you receive? How did you handle that phone call volume? When you could not answer a question in the first phone call, what was your system to make sure you returned the call later with the answer?

In your position, tell me about your paper workload. What kind of paperwork did you handle? How quickly did it pass across your desk and on to the next step? What was your system for handling that paperwork?

Remember that the purpose of these questions has to do with behaviors that “fit” the culture. I am not looking for the correct way to run an “in” basket. I am looking for momentum, energy and action, because those are important to “fit” in our culture.

Tomorrow, we will look at questions that interview for “values.” -TF

Interview for Fuzzy

1 Reply

From the Ask Tom mailbag.

A week or so ago, I received an interesting cross communiqué from Joshua Herzig-Marx, who was compiling some thoughts about hiring. In his article he was discussing the sometimes misguided tendencies of hiring managers to consider fuzzy ideas like

How well will the candidate fit with our existing team?

Does the candidate share our organization’s values?

Will the candidate bring the right attitude?

And I got to thinking. These ideas are actually good ideas, fuzzy as they may be. Here is the rub. How can the hiring manager, who is not a psychologist, evaluate the candidate on fit, values and attitude?

Actually, I observe many companies who spend lots of dollars on psychometric testing to learn the answers to these elusive questions. These are not unimportant. (I love double negatives, drove my English teacher crazy).

You have to get down to behaviors. You are not a psychologist, but you can spot positive behavior and negative behavior in the workplace. Observing and evaluating behavior is what managers do. Play to your strength. Interview for behaviors.

Fit. How does a person who “fits” our organization behave?

Values. How does a person with our values behave?

Attitude. How does a person with a positive attitude behave?

Now, interview for those behaviors. Yes, the fuzzy stuff is important and it can be a valuable part of the interview and the criteria for hiring. -TF

Eric’s Feelings

Leave a reply

“Breaking the large group into smaller groups seems like a good idea,” said Rosa. We were talking about getting her department engaged in team problem solving. “I can see how that makes the contributions more anonymous.”

“It makes a huge difference. It allows the team to do something that it could never do before,” I said. Rosa’s eyes grew larger.

“What’s that?” she asked.

“Well, you know, Eric, your team’s eager beaver? When Eric has an idea, he is a little sensitive to the group’s response. Let’s say that one part of Eric’s idea has a creative spark, but the rest of the idea needs to be discarded. As long as it is Eric’s idea, the team has to tap-dance around, be politically correct and tactful. But if the ideas are flip charted from a small group, somewhat anonymous, whose ideas are they now?”

“Well, now they are the group’s ideas,” responded Rosa.

“So, if the ideas belong to the team, the team can now rip out that little creative spark, junk the rest of the idea, bolt the spark onto the back end of another idea, reverse engineer the logic and no one’s feelings get hurt.

“When it was Eric’s idea, the team couldn’t do that.” -TF

Priming the Pump

4 Replies

“I really feel awkward standing up in front of the group. I ask them a question and often, they just stare at me, like no one has a clue. I want them to participate, but they just don’t respond,” said Rosa. As the manager in her department, she had been trying to get more participation through team problem solving.

“Why don’t you think they speak up?” I asked.

“I don’t know,” Rosa continued. “I suppose they might be embarrassed or afraid someone will think their idea is stupid.”

“I think you are right. Fear can be very powerful. It can keep people from risking their ideas in front of a group. So, how can you reduce the fear?”

Rosa pondered the question, and then responded. “I guess I have to create a safe place, so no idea comes across as a stupid idea.”

I smiled and jumped in. “Here is something I often use. Before I ask people to respond in front of a group, I always ask them to write their ideas on paper. I call it, priming the pump. And if the group is a large group, I always bust it up into smaller teams. People are more willing to share their ideas in a small group than in a large group. Once everyone has shared their ideas in a small team, only then do I ask each team to report to the larger group. By then, most of the ideas are anonymous and the risk of embarrassment has virtually disappeared.

“When you engage your team in problem solving, an important job for the leader is to drive fear out of the room.” -TF

First Assignment

1 Reply

From the Ask Tom mailbag.

Question

I have just joined a new company as a project manager and have been assigned to report to another project manager. While this person has been with the company for a while, he is not that far ahead of me technically, though he knows some of the ins and outs of our clients. My problem is that I have been here for a week and a half and, though I have approached him several times about assignments, he continues to keep everything to himself. I am getting tired of staring at my computer screen. I don’t want to go around him, but I don’t know what I can do.

Response

Your manager is obviously more interested in task oriented work rather than management oriented work. You may even be his first direct report, so he may not even know what to do or how to manage you.

Whatever his reasons are, it really doesn’t matter. The first obstacle you have to overcome is trust. You have to get to know him. And I am not talking about warm and fuzzy stuff, this can be brilliantly professional. Grab him at a coffee break, before or after work and try these questions:

Where did you go to school?
How did that prepare you for your career as a project manager?
What attracted you to project management?
What is the most interesting project you have ever completed?
What part of your job do you find the most satisfying? (Hint, he is likely to also tell you the part he finds the least satisfying…which may be your entry into an assignment for some productive work).

Ask him what the most appropriate first assignment might be. Would it be a small project on your own, a segment of a larger project, or simply a small task in a larger segment?

Each day, ask him if there is some small thing that you could do for him that would be truly helpful. It doesn’t have to be a huge assignment, yet something you can successfully complete that begins to build the trust. It might even be an administrative task like collecting all the projects in a list and tagging the status of each project, who is working on it, etc. (This will be helpful to you, because you will know about projects in-house). Good luck, keep us updated on your progress. -TF

Enthusiasm and Discretionary Effort

Leave a reply

From the Ask Tom Mailbox

Question:

How can I, as a co-worker, get more attention to detail and productive effort from this new person in my department. She doesn’t report to me, but I request a number of projects from her each day.

Response:

This is a follow-up to the last couple of days. Tuesday, we talked about authority and power. Yesterday, we talked about authority and its inability to influence things like energy, enthusiasm and discretionary effort.

Repeated desired behavior only comes from positive reinforcement. You have the power (notice I said power, not authority) to create those conditions of positive reinforcement. However, here is the important insight. This positive reinforcement must be meaningful. My guess is, no manager has taken the time to find out what is important to this new team member. No manager has ever sat down to discover her interests, hobbies, passions or pursuits. It is only when those connections get made, that progress toward discretionary efforts will occur.

So, what to do? If you want to see productive effort, you have to discover these things. I suggest a Mineral Rights conversation . Take this person to lunch and find out what makes her tick. It is only with this information that you will be able to create a meaningful environment to gain that discretionary effort. -TF

Your Company May Have It Right

Leave a reply

More from the Ask Tom mailbag.

This story continues from yesterday’s question where a team member with no supervisory authority is left to request production from another team member. We focused on the difference between authority and power, acknowledging that, while a manager may have the authority to direct a project, the team member ultimately has the power to control the speed and quality of the execution.

Response

“But your company may have it right. The fact that your team mate reports to another manager may be perfectly appropriate. Though you depend on this person, the relationship is not one of accountability, but one of interdependence. This interdependence is very real.

“The bottom line is that it doesn’t matter whether the relationship is one of accountability or one of interdependence, the team member still has the power to control the speed and quality of the execution.

“The accountability authority you seek has little to do with influencing enthusiasm, energy and discretionary effort. Discretionary effort comes from a positive decision on the part of your co-worker. You do not need authority to create the conditions for this positive decision.

Tomorrow, we will tackle how to create those conditions and what to do first. -TF

Vegetables and Power

Leave a reply

Question:

We have a new person in our department. As the project manager, I request many work elements from her each day, however, she reports to another manager in the department. I feel there is a lack of accountability and attention to detail in much of her work, which requires me to follow-up and complete many of these work elements. Her manager seems too busy to notice how low the productivity is from our new team member. I think it would have been better to have this person report to me, but that is not the way she was assigned. Any suggestions?

Response:
You are in a classic dilemma, where you are dependent on the production and work of another person yet have no authority to hold this person accountable for performance. There are two things to consider, both of which land you in the same place. We will talk about one angle today and another tomorrow.

Organizations often have reporting alignment mismatched. You depend on this person, yet have no authority to hold this person accountable. Even in this misalignment, you may need to understand the difference between authority and power. Even if you did have the authority to hold this person accountable, this person still has the power to decide whether the work will be completed and to determine its quality.

It is like a parent who has the authority to issue a policy about vegetables that will be served for dinner, however the child has the power to determine whether broccoli will indeed be eaten.

So, even if you did have the authority, this person still has the power. More tomorrow. -TF