Author Archives: Tom Foster

About Tom Foster

Tom Foster spends most of his time talking with managers and business owners. The conversations are about business lives and personal lives, goals, objectives and measuring performance. In short, transforming groups of people into teams working together. Sometimes we make great strides understanding this management stuff, other times it’s measured in very short inches. But in all of this conversation, there are things that we learn. This blog is that part of the conversation I can share. Often, the names are changed to protect the guilty, but this is real life inside of real companies.

Dedicated, but Insufficient

“I am not sure where the problem is,” Gerald said. “He has been with the company for eight years, so he knows the ropes, how things are done, what the culture is. But ever since we promoted him four months ago, he has been different.”

“In what way,” I replied.

“Well, he seems dedicated enough, shows up early, stays late, though, during the day, I can’t seem to find him.”

“What about his performance. How effective do you think he is, based on what you expect from his position?”

“That’s the thing,” Gerald sighed. “I don’t think he is effective, but you can’t ever pin him down to find out what the problem is. His department never delivers on time, and when they finally do, it’s incomplete. They always have to scramble to finish the job.”

“What problems does that create?”

“Morale, for one. His team’s enthusiasm is pretty low. They complain about having to do the same job twice, or get halfway through something and have to stop, tear it down and start over on another ‘more important’ project.”

“And?”

“And, it’s having an impact on customers. Some of the phone calls are getting all the way up to me. When they get to me, something is wrong.”

“So, what do you think is happening?” -TF

Can’t Succeed Based on Performance

Gerald was getting impatient, up and down from his chair, pacing the floor. “But that’s the way we work. Management by Objectives.”

“I can see that,” I responded, nodding. “You gave him six months to hit his objectives, but you can already see that his behavior, as a Manager, is not effective?”

“Well, yes. And even trying to pin him down on his objectives. He’s just slippery. We are trying to measure the benchmarks and we can’t get the information. He has a production report that is due every Friday, but I never get it on time. And then, when I do get it, there is something screwy with the numbers, like a formula is wrong, or the columns don’t foot with each other. So I ask him to fix it and it’s another week before I see him again. Meanwhile, another Friday report is due and late again.”

“So, he can’t succeed based on his effectiveness, but he can succeed based on his ability to manage the data that you don’t receive about his performance?” –TF

Bad Decision?

From the Ask Tom mailbag:

Question:

Need advice on recovering from a bad decision I made that has caused my boss and several other to be disappointed in me. I apologized to my boss for my actions and he says I didn’t do anything wrong, but the look on his face and others indicates that that is not his true feelings. I didn’t support my boss and several other is a plan that they worked on for months, I didn’t do it intentionally, just got caught up in the momentum of a new idea. I made a quick decision that was wrong. Really don’t know how to recover and feel better. These people are important to me and I’m personally and professionally upset with myself.

Response:

I am going to agree with your boss and take it on face value that you did NOT do anything wrong. So, quit beating yourself up.

Disagreements and enthusiastic other positions are healthy on any management team. If there are no disagreements, then you don’t need those people on the management team. By the way, this would not be the first time a CEO and a management team worked for six months on the wrong thing.

On the other hand, I don’t need unsubstantiated opinion without evidence to support it. I also need an attitude of cooperation and support in the midst of the disagreement. It sounds like this.

“Thank you for inviting me to this meeting. I know this project is very important to the company.

“This may be difficult to hear, because I know you have all worked very hard on this project, and I am in possession of some information and supporting data that may put this project in jeopardy. We may be working on the wrong thing.

“The reason I am presenting this information today is so that, at the end of the meeting, we can agree on a plan of action. We still may not agree with the facts or the data, but we need to agree on a plan of action that we can all support.

“If you had information that was adverse to one of my projects, I would expect you to challenge me in the same way.

“I have the data organized into a handout and I can present these ideas in approximately five minutes. Do I have the team’s permission to proceed?”

Not Sam’s Problem

“What has to happen in the next two hours that will indicate time well spent,” Sam asked. Each person looked around at each of the other members of this management team, then looked down and began to write.

It was not Sam’s intention to figure out the solution to this problem. It was Sam’s intention to have the group figure out the solution to this problem.

The responses from the team were positive.

  • We have to agree on the purpose. We have to agree on what we are trying to achieve. We have to agree on the goal.
  • We have to agree on what actions we will take. We have to agree on the coordination and interdependencies of those actions. This has to be a period of cooperation.
  • We have to agree on what results we are looking for. We have to agree on what measures we will collect and analyze. We have to agree to raise the flag when something doesn’t look right, not to bury our statistics in a warehouse.

Most importantly, this was no longer Sam’s problem. This problem now belonged to the group. -TF

A System Problem

The conference room was comfortable. New leather chairs and a marble top. Nothing like success to create a little overhead.

Sam had assembled a cast of the brightest minds in the company. Marketing was represented, sales, customer service, production and accounting. Everyone looked armed with official looking reports, charts and graphs, ready to defend the slightest attack.

Sam was good. He wasn’t looking for a scapegoat. He knew the problem wasn’t from someone being lazy, or even a wrong decision. He knew it was more likely that the organization’s system needed some attention.

He began by explaining what he had observed, and asked each member to accurately report the real figures behind the events. Unfortunately, four weeks worth of excess finished goods had translated into an eight-week inventory turn. Something had put the brakes on the market.

“So, take a piece of paper,” Sam began, “and write down your condition of satisfaction for this meeting? What has to happen in the next two hours that will indicate time well spent?”

Hidden Over-Production

The good news was that we had stumbled on the problem early. Sam arrived in Corina’s office about two minutes after the phone call.

“I thought something was up when I was down here a couple of weeks ago,” he reported. “I figured there must have been some snafu in shipping that was causing a bottleneck, and I had some fires somewhere else, so I hoped that shipping would figure it out on their own.”

“We figured it out,” Corina chimed in. “We put the over-production in the Fifth Street Warehouse, so we could keep working around here.”

“But, I thought we sold the Fifth Street Warehouse,” Sam interrupted.

“Almost. But I talked to the Real Estate Department and they hadn’t had any serious offers, the listing had just expired and they were actually glad that we needed the space to put the inventory.”

Sam looked especially troubled. “Corina, I need you to gather the data, the real data on what we have in the warehouse, and your current production rates. We need to do some thinking about this. Let’s meet tomorrow at 10:00 in the conference room.”

By Policies and Directives

“I need you to make a phone call,” I told Corina. She looked puzzled, feeling guilty about something she wasn’t sure of.

“There’s a lesson in this,” I continued. “It’s a counterintuitive lesson that most people and organizations don’t learn until it’s too late.”

“So, you are talking about the difference between the company’s goal and my goal for the plant?” she asked.

I nodded, “Yes, the difference. There shouldn’t be a difference. But no one sat down and punched through all this, so there could be agreement. In fact, I would bet that you never sat in a meeting to truly clarify the goal for the plant. I would bet you assumed, by all manner of policies and directives, to produce as much as you could as efficiently as you could.”

I was nodding. Corina was nodding. “How much excess inventory is now hiding in that warehouse?” I asked.

Corina smiled, but quickly realized what had seemed to be good news wasn’t after all. “I would have to pull the reports, but I think we have about four weeks of production built up in the warehouse. I mean, we were building to forecast, but we weren’t selling to forecast.”

“Okay, let’s make that phone call.”

Out of Sight

“Come on, I think you are splitting hairs,” Corina said. “Everyone knows that the goal of the company is to make money, and the goal of the plant floor is to make as much product as efficiently as possible.”

“Is it, really?” I asked.

Corina stopped. She was trying to be defensive without being defensive. Rarely works.

“Has there ever been a time,” I continued, “where you were doing such a good job on the plant floor that you produced more than the company was selling?”

“Oh, all the time. We always produce to the sales forecast that Joe puts together. And his forecast is always wrong. I mean, right now, is a good example. If you had been here last week, you would have seen stuff stacked up all over the place. We even had three semi-trucks in the parking lot loaded with finished goods.”

“Where is it all now?”

“Well, there was a warehouse that we were trying to sell. I got lucky and found out in time to stop it, so we moved all the excess inventory there. Now, that’s utilization of resources.”

“Who knows about this?” I probed. “Does Sam, your VP of Ops know?”

“Yeah, he was down here a couple of weeks ago and saw all the inventory. He looked concerned, but I told him we were working on it. When he came down a couple of days later, I had all the stuff taken care of. He looked relieved.”

Our conversation became quiet. -TF

Which Purpose?

Registration closes tomorrow for our next Leadership program in Fort Lauderdale. Visit www.workingleadership.com. We kick-off the class this Wednesday, March 19.
__

Corina was still puzzled. She was struggling with the question about the purpose for the organization. “The purpose for the plant,” she said, “is to make as much product as efficiently as we can.”

“I know that’s the way it seems,” I replied. “But what is the purpose for the organization?” Corina had been thinking about her Cap Ex budget for 2009. “If you only think about the plant, you will make wrong decisions,” I continued. “What is the purpose of the organization?”

Corina was in deep thought. She was certain this was a trick question. “The purpose of the organization is to make money,” she finally offered.

“Yes, and only when you remember that purpose, will your thinking about the budget be correct.” -TF
__

For those believers, Happy St. Patrick’s Day!! Green beer tonight.

PAR

Corina was puzzled. Her simple Cap Ex budget exercise that took her a week to prepare, now knowing it was a 15 month Time Span task, had caused her to think. That’s the point. Defining the Time Span of the task communicates the “real” complexity of the task. This was not a simple exercise. The Cap Ex budget is a complicated task and will require some deep thought, some research, some data gathering.

“Where do I start?” she asked.

“Do you remember my golf analogy?” I replied.

“You mean PAR?”

I nodded.

“P stands for Purpose, A stands for Action, R stands for Results. First I have to define the Purpose?”

I nodded again. “We cannot go any further until we define the purpose. What is the purpose of the organization?”

“The organization?” she leaned back. “But I just run the plant floor?”

“But if you just think about the plant floor, you will make wrong decisions. What is the purpose of the organization?” -TF