Category Archives: Timespan

But, what about today?

“But, what about today?” asked Kristen. “It’s great to think about the future, but I have to get stuff done today.”

In class, we had been talking about how a manager has to think differently.

“The anchor for the manager has to be some specific time point in the future. Every action we take only has meaning related to that future time point. Call it planning, call it a milestone, call it a goal.

“You are right. You have to get stuff done today. Action occurs today. The role of the manager is to inspect that future time point and create today’s effective action. Here is the question. What is the destination, and what is the most effective action we can take, today, to get there?” -TF

Into the Future

We kicked off a new management program last week. With every class, I have a new manager, recently promoted, on the cusp of a brand new role.

“What’s the biggest difference? What will change for me? What do I have to learn?” The questions reveal the chasm, a chasm that requires a journey full of twists, turns and decisions to be made.

“The biggest difference,” I begin, “is time span. As a manager, you will begin to think further into the future.

“As a team leader of a crew, you might think about what needs to be produced this week. As a new supervisor, you also have to think about what the schedule looks like for two weeks. The big project three weeks from now will require more prep and staging time.

“As a new manager, you have to think about your system that captures forecast data and translates that data into materials, people, equipment and timelines.

“Becoming a manager, at any level, requires you to think further into the future, using your own discretionary judgment.” -TF

It’s a Skill Set

Timo Söderlund, from Ebit Management, in Sweden, captured an important point in his comment posted last week. It was in response to our series about Cheryl, a technical troubleshooter who was recruited to improve throughput for a manufacturing company.

This is what you see quite often. An excellent salesman is promoted to become sales manager. It may work, but it may also fail. If you, at a certain age, have developed your skills and love the things you are doing – as a specialist or expert, and then start doing something else – like becoming a manager – I question if it can be “trained” into that person to become as successful a manager as he or she was before, in their field of expertise. A manager – in my view – is more concerned in people, their interaction, and the performance of the “team” – and this is quite far away from being an expert in a certain technical or administrative field.

In our classroom program, I have seen a number of technical and engineering people thrust into the role of management. Though they are extremely bright, this new management role requires a completely different skill set.

And it is a skill set of behaviors that can be learned. Interesting, I find that once learned, these skills have a transforming effect on the manager, as a person.

Beginning tomorrow, I will spend a few days exploring the role of positive reinforcement. “What gets measured gets done, but what gets reinforced, gets repeated.” -TF

Our next management program begins in Fort Lauderdale on September 25. For registration information, please visit www.workingmanagement.com.

Get the List

Audrey had been silent for almost thirty seconds, eyes deep in thought. “So, identifying the Time Span for a project is pretty easy, because it has a deadline. Does Time Span apply to other jobs that are not quite so defined?”

“Of course. We always have some timeline in mind for any task. Elliott Jaques called it the Timeline of Intention. Time Span can be used to define not only specific tasks, but also to define specific roles inside the company.

“Let’s take payroll, for example. Every week, the payroll clerk prepares the timesheets, calculates the additional elements of each paycheck, like 401(k) and such. You might say that payroll has a one week Time Span. In reality, payroll is a bit more complicated because of its reporting at the end of every three months.

“Payroll clerks know that every payroll transaction has an impact on that quarterly report and if something gets screwed up on a payroll run, it is going to be screwed up when it comes time to prepare that quarterly report.

“Even though payroll may be run once a week or once every two weeks, the payroll clerk is always focused on the quarterly report. The Time Span for payroll is three months.

“Here, take a look at this. It’s a list I put together. I collected a number of roles in a typical company and identified the Time Span for each position. You might find this helpful.” -TF

If you would like to see the list I showed to Audrey, just drop me an email and I will send you a copy. It’s a couple of pages, quick read.

Really Big Job

“So, Time Spans can be anywhere between a few minutes and a month?” Audrey asked. We had been talking about how to identify the complexity of a task by how long it takes to complete.

“What if you had a task that takes longer than a month to complete?” I responded.

“What could take longer than a month?” Audrey’s curiosity was touched.

“Look at some of the outside projects that your Project Managers run. How long does it take for one of your longer projects?”

Audrey pulled a memo out of her in-basket. “Well, we just got this project last week and it won’t be completed until next June. And actually, with some of the delays we anticipate, this project will probably take eighteen months.”

“Can you give that assignment to one of your junior Project Managers?” I asked.

“No way. This will be a complicated project. We have no idea what material shortages or cost escalations will occur. To make this profitable, we have to have someone who is comfortable working way into the future.”

“Big job?”

“Big job.”

“How big is big? Use Time Span to describe it,” I directed.

Audrey stopped. “The Sun Tower Project has an eighteen month Time Span.” She stopped again. “So, when we pick a Project Manager, we want to pick someone who has run a job for eighteen months before. Only two of our Project Managers have that kind of experience.” -TF

Precisely How Big?

“Identifying the Time Span of the first task is easy,” Audrey continued. We were talking about the Time Spans of different tasks to figure out how big, big is. “The first task is just moving some junk out of the way in the loading bay, so forty five minutes.

“But, the second task, where we have to anticipate all the different things that move through the loading bay, that will take longer to think about. Plus we have cargo containers that get loaded in the bay, so we have to stack things in different places when that happens. If I had to create a policy for how we move things through the loading bay, I would have to think about all those things.”

“And if we set perimeters around the loading bay using safety tape to mark zones for received materials versus outgoing materials, would that also be part of the thinking?” I asked.

“You’re right, this would be a big job,” Audrey concluded.

“Okay, how big of a job? Use Time Span to describe it.”

“We are going to have to talk to the Shipping Manager and get his input. We will also have to get with our Freight Coordinator to find out what kind of vehicles and containers we load. The Purchasing Manager can tell us about incoming materials. The Safety Director can help us understand the physical perimeters and safety zones, how high we can stack stuff. Then we will have to write the policy, present it through a couple of meetings to get more input and revisions. This will probably take a month. I will say the Time Span of this project to be about a month.”

“So, when you think about how big a job is, we can use Time Span to more precisely describe its complexity?”

“Yes,” replied Audrey. “And it will also help me pick the right person for the assignment.” -TF

How Big is Big?

“Tell me more about Time Span. I think I understand, but I’m not sure,” Audrey was curious.

“Do you ever wonder about how to judge the complexity of a job, ever wonder how to describe its mental difficulty?” I asked.

“Well, yeah. Sometimes when I delegate something, I don’t know who to choose. Or I don’t know if the person can complete the task without a lot of my help.”

“Exactly,” I said. “We use different words, like, it’s going to be a big job. Or it’s going to be a tough assignment. Well, just exactly how big is a big job, and just exactly how tough is a tough assignment. Would you like to have a measuring stick that describes precisely how big, big is?”

Audrey leaned forward. Her eyes grew wide. “Yes,” she replied.

“The answer is Time Span. Think about the complexity of task related to how long it takes to complete it.”

“Give me an example,” she said.

“Okay, tell me the time span for this task? Please move all the junk away from the loading bay so we can get this stack of product loaded on a truck that arrives here in :45 minutes.”

“That’s easy,” she said, “Forty-five minutes.”

“Okay, tell me the Time Span for this task? Please arrange the loading bay and create a policy for material flow to accommodate all the different products that we load on all the different vehicles and shipping containers?

“It looks like a similar task, but it requires a totally different Time Span. What do you say?” -TF

The Measuring Stick

From the Ask Tom mailbag:

Question:

Tell me more about Time Span. You have mentioned this several times since I’ve been reading your blog, but I do not think I have a clear understanding of what you mean. Give me some details behind the thinking.

Response:

Time Span is the central theme behind an extensive body of research conducted over a period of 50 years by Elliott Jaques. Time Span, as a concept, can be used to understand and measure several elements related to the complexity of a task, complexity of a role and the capability of a person. It has implications for the company org chart, reporting protocols and hiring criteria.

Time Span is defined as “the length of time that a person can work, into the future, without direction, using their own discretionary judgment.”

The Time Span of a delegated task would be the length of elapsed time between the task handoff meeting and the completion of the task. Time Span is used to precisely measure the complexity of any task. The complexity of a task is created by the uncertainty of its elements and its outcome.

The shorter the Time Span, the more certain are its elements and its outcome. The longer the Time Span, the less certain are its elements and its outcome. Time Span becomes the measuring stick.

Now, I am absolutely certain that I have created many more questions. -TF

Time Span and Responsibility

From the Ask Tom mailbag:

Question:

My boss feels I am very good at my work, but that I don’t take responsibility. I tried to ask him what he means by that. He said that I have to be told every time what I must do. So, I tried to do things on my own initiative, but then he questions me “who told you to do this?” Most of the time when I ask about something I think I should do, he says “no” and asks me to do something else. How do I impress my boss that I am a person who takes responsibility or is at least willing to take responsibility?

Response:

Your attitude and willingness are in the right place, so let’s make one small change. I want you to ask your boss to meet with you to plan out your work for an entire day. I want you to create a checklist on paper and then work the checklist. The problem is not responsibility. You appear to be a responsible person.

The problem is time span. You appear to work on a single task at a time and then return to your boss for more direction. I want you to lengthen the time span by creating a checklist with a sequence of tasks for the entire day.

At the end of the day, you will be able to show him the checklist and what items you have completed. That will be evidence that you are, indeed, a responsible person.

The key is time span.

Maximum Capability

Thanks to Arne for his comment Tuesday. The discussion was in response to an inquiry of the source for the descriptive term Strata in relation to various roles in the organization. I have been working extensively with Elliott Jaques research for the past five years. Arne’s experience, however, was not altogether positive

The work of Jacques appears to most at the outset as interesting and logical.

It becomes more troubling as one reads his entire book (page pairs and all) and you realize some of the more subversive themes to his work. Notably that individuals have a natural maximum stratum that they are capable at working – and this stratus maximus is determined during their childhood. If a worker, say deemed as a Stratum II worker bee, then in an organization that follows this discipline naturally would not promote them further than this.

Arne, I would certainly agree that Jaques work is controversial but would never characterize it as subversive. I think more accurately, the implementation made by your company may have been misguided. It is very easy to misinterpret Jaques.

He did, indeed, believe that each person has a maximum capability to handle complex tasks in a given role, just as we are all genetically determined to grow to a certain height. At my height, I will never become an effective NBA basketball player. No matter how many toe stretches I do or how much training I may get, I will never make it on that court.

Maximum capability is a bit more difficult to detect. But the practice you describe, slotting a person in Strata II for the balance of their life, is precisely the wrong managerial practice. The Requisite managerial practice would be to continually test the individual with longer time span assignments until they reach the point at which they fail. That failure would indicate, at that moment, there is evidence that maximum capability was exceeded. The Requisite managerial practice would then be to shorten the time span assignment back to where the person was successful. Then wait.

Wait perhaps, three months, then test the person again with a longer time span assignment. This process should be repeated, continually challenging a person to reach their highest level of capability throughout their career.

In your experience, it is possible that this practice was not clearly understood or miscommunicated. It is always the job of the manager to constantly challenge team members to their highest levels of performance.

Gotta go practice my free throws, Dwayne Wade is on the phone. -TF

Tour de France Update

It was the first day in the Pyranees, the first mountain stage and things got weird. With many of the major contenders disqualified or out of the race, distant riders are taking chances and dicing things up.

Who is Cyril Dessel (FRA-A2R)? Well, he formed an early breakaway today that succeeded and he ended up, not only with the yellow jersey, but with the polka-dot King of the Mountain jersey as well. Juan Miguel Mercado (ESP-AGR) was the stage winner, but it was not enough to knock out Dessel.

Sergiy Gonchar (UKR-TMO) had predictable trouble when he hit the mountains. Big gears and mountains don’t go well together. Floyd Landis (USA-PHO) was content to let the opportunists notch him down to fifth place, hoping they will not be able to sustain successive back to back efforts.

Team Discovery’s Paolo Salvodelli (ITA-DSC) trails Landis by 1min 10sec and may be USAs only hope for a podium finish. George Hincapie (USA-DSC) drops to 19th place, two minutes behind Landis. Tomorrow is another rough day in the Pyranees.

Overall Standings after Stage Ten

1-DESSEL, Cyril -FRA-A2R -43hrs 7min 5sec

2-MERCADO, Juan Miguel -ESP-AGR –+2min 34sec

3-HONCHAR, Serhiy -UKR-TMO –+3min 45sec

4-MORENI, Cristian -ITA-COF –+3min 51sec

5-LANDIS, Floyd -USA-PHO –+4min 45sec

6-ROGERS, Michael -AUS-TMO –+4min 53sec

7-LANDALUZE, Inigo -ESP-EUS –+5min 22sec

8-SINKEWITZ, Patrik -GER-TMO –+5min 30sec

9-KLÖDEN, Andréas -GER-TMO –+5min 35sec

10-KARPETS, Vladimir -RUS-CEI –+5min 37sec

11-EVANS, Cadel -AUS-DVL –+5min 37sec

12-ZABRISKIE, David -USA-CSC –+5min 38sec

13-FOTHEN, Marcus -GER-GST –+5min 48sec

14-MOREAU, Christophe -FRA-A2R –+5min 52sec

15-SAVOLDELLI, Paolo -ITA-DSC –+5min 55sec

16-MENCHOV, Denis -RUS-RAB –+5min 58sec

17-KESSLER, Matthias -GER-TMO –+6min 1sec

18-SASTRE, Carlos -ESP-CSC –+6min 12sec

19-HINCAPIE, George -USA-DSC –+6min 15sec

20-PEREIRO SIO, Oscar -ESP-CEI –+6min 42sec