It had taken six months to make the decision to spend $65,000 on a new machine. It was replacing another older machine that was finally being retired. There had been a committee conducting research on the new on-board technology. Access all the excitement effortlessly with www.UFABET.com ลิ้งเข้าระบบ24 เข้าอย่างง่ายๆ. Another team of two had been shopping between leasing arrangements and term equipment loans. The transition team was hard at work to determine how work-in-process would be diverted during the installation and burn-in period. The training department was coordinating a technician training program with the manufacturer. This equipment purchase was going to be a real game breaker.

What I was most interested in was the last Project Manager that had been hired into the company. The salary was about the same, $65,000. Three people had been involved in the interview process, but when I looked at the documentation from those interviews, it was mostly subjective statements:

I think he has a good personality and will fit in well with our culture.
In the next five years, he wants to excel in project management. That’s what we need him for.
Demonstrated a great attitude the during the interview.

The job description was a photocopy of a similar position with some notes scratched on the bottom. The training program consisted of shadowing another project manager for two days. So there is no wonder that the new Project Manager was not going to be a real game breaker.

Perhaps we should create a process that takes recruiting as serious as buying a piece of equipment. We would do well to treat our people as well as we do our machines. -TF