I managed to get two steps up the food chain, talking with the boss of Olivia’s boss, a senior vice president in the company.
“So, how did the audit project get delayed for your ISO re-certification?” I asked.
“I don’t know. You spoke with Olivia, one of our supervisors. Her manager, Brad, is really in charge of that project, it’s a Stratum III role, and we have had more troubles than just the audit with Brad.”
“Procrastination?” I suggested.
His eyes grew wide and his head began to nod in agreement. Eyebrows furrowed. “Yes. And I have talked to him about getting a jump on these longer term projects. Brad is okay with projects of about 60 days, but anything longer than that and he really gets in the weeds. In the end, you start to see him power through, working overtime and weekends. When he started working here, he looked really dedicated, but as time goes on, I don’t see that as effective manager behavior.”
“What length project is Brad good at?”
“Two months.”
“And how much time is left before the audit?”
“Two months.”
“What connection can you make from that?” -TF
Quick question, I was under the impression that an ISO recertification project isn’t that much work and preparation as an ISO certification project (as you’ve already went through the process before). Am I right in my assumption?
The connection being that Brad has been allowed to procrastinate without any over sight from his supervisors. Since it is common knowledge of this fact then a) why was he given this task with out a progressive time table in place and b) will his behavior of being known as one who procrastrates allow his direct reports the same type of leway?