From the Ask Tom mailbag:
Question:
How can you motivate a team member whose appraisal has not been good?
Response:
In the past, I have talked about the four elements for success. They are:
- Capability
- Skill
- Commitment
- Absence of a negative Temperament
So, which is it? And how did you get here?
If the person received a poor effectiveness review, is it a matter of capability? As the manager, you should have made an accurate (within a reasonable range) assessment of capability during the interview and testing process. If the person received a poor review based on capability, you have only two choices, reassign the person or redefine the role.
If the poor review is from a lack of skill, then training is indicated. Skill is two things, technical knowledge and practiced performance.
If the poor review is from a lack of commitment, you, as the manager have two routes. One is to create artificial commitment. Artificial commitment comes in the form of pizza, promises or other incentives. Artificial commitment is okay, but is usually shortlived and requires the presence of the manager. Real commitment requires the discovery of the interests (passion) of the person and the alignment of that interest with the work. If that connection has not been made, poor performance is a likely result.
If the poor review is from the presence of a negative temperament, you, as the manager can talk until you are blue in the face, or perhaps bash your head into the wall for a while, but in the long run, negative temperament is rooted inside the individual. It takes a very special manager (and a blue face and some head bashing) to change a negative temperament. This is usually outside the skill base of most managers. In this case, I would seek to reassign or terminate the team member.
So, you decide. Which is it? -TF
I think that is a very lopsided view. The reason being that the fault could also lie with the company. Either they could not have made the right judgement about the person or not assigned him with the right roles to be able to earn the required credit.
Along with the four issues you talked about, a manager should also try to look at how the employee has been treated (in terms of opportunities, behaviour etc) in the past review cycle period by the company.
Harpreet,
Good to hear from you again. Thank you for some alternative perspectives from the other side of the lopside.
What you do depends largely on “when” the concern has been voiced out.
You might have heard this when the employee has already resigned (as in most cases) or when you came to know through grapevine that she has just attended interviews with the competitor. In either cases, the employee has made her decision already and you need to control the domino effect of her exit. This is where I agree with Harpreet, finding out how the employee has been treated allows you to investigate if there are other “victims” within the organization and be proactive.
But yes, performance, commitment and attitude towards the company are most important things to look out for.