As Phillip simmered, he finally blurted out, “But they should know how to schedule. How hard is that?”
“I don’t know, Phillip. How complicated are your scheduling logistics?” I asked. We had been talking about his Project Managers. Though technically proficient, they seemed to have difficulty creating and maintaining current schedules.
“It’s just getting the materials and the people scheduled. It’s not that difficult.” Phillip was firm.
“What is the biggest problem they face in scheduling?”
Phillip thought for a minute, hoping to tell me there were never problems, but he knew better. “I guess the biggest problem is coordinating with the other subs on the job, to make sure their work is finished and the project is ready for the work we do. Since the subs don’t work for us, coordinating with them is sometimes difficult.”
“So, how do you train your PMs to deal with that?”
“Train ’em. They’re just supposed to know that they have to go check.” It was not a good answer and Phillip was beginning to backpedal.
I pressed. “On the job, do materials ever get backordered? Does a crew member ever call in sick or a whole crew get reassigned to an emergency? Does the contractor ever change something without a change order? Does a piece of heavy equipment get delayed on another project and not show up? Does a dumpster load sometimes not get switched out in time. Does a code inspector sometimes not show up?
“Tell me, Phillip. How do you train your Project Managers to create and maintain schedules?”
Phillip hesitated. He knew any response would just sound like an excuse.
“Phillip, here is the critical factor. Actually doing the work is completely different from making sure the work gets done. It’s a different role in the company. It has its own skill set. You don’t hire for it, you don’t train for it, but right now, it’s killing you.” -TF
Absolutely correct. That’s why the best sales people aren’t necessarily the best sales managers.
Managing is different from doing. Getting things done through others is different from doing them yourself.
Harvard Psychologist, David McClelland (sp?)pointed this out in the 60’s in his dicusssion of three different human needs: achievement, affiliation, power.
People with high need for achievement make good individual contributors. People with high needs for power make good leaders. A quick note — McClelland used the word “power” to mean the need to be influential and get things done through others — not the need for command and control.
Bud Bilanich
The Common Sense Guy
http://www.CommonSenseGuy.com