Jeremy was not as excited as I expected after his first project follow-up meeting.
“Why the long face?” I asked.
“Well, I thought by scheduling follow-up meetings, the project would just start happening and show some progress. I just finished the first follow-up meeting and find out the project hasn’t even been started yet. I am still in the same boat as last week.”
“What do you think the problem is?”
Jeremy’s mind was searching for a directional clue. “I don’t know. Sylvia just said she was having trouble getting started, but was sure that by Friday, we would see some progress.”
“What does progress mean?” I continued to probe.
Jeremy was puzzled by the question. “Well, you know, she will have started.”
“What is her first step to getting started?”
Jeremy hesitated. His response was only going to be a guess. I stopped him.
“Jeremy, don’t feel bad. This is very typical of projects that haven’t been laid out clearly. She hasn’t started the project because she doesn’t know what the next step is. Heck, you don’t know what the next step is.
“Have you ever had a project that you found difficult to get started. But once you got rolling everything was fine. What caused you to stutter is that you had not defined the next step. Understanding the power of the next step will give you a clue on how to get projects rolling. We will talk more about that, but for now, you need to have an interim emergency meeting with Sylvia to lay out the next steps in this project. And remember, since she will be doing the work, she needs to participate heavily in the design of these next steps.” -TF
In the follow-up meeting, did Jeremy ask the team members to participate in defining what the next steps would be? Did he reiterate the project to make sure that all the team members had the same concept of the goal to be achieved in a distinct time frame?
Barbara,
Thank you for your question. You are correct in your insistence that Sylvia be a part of the design of the next steps.