From the Ask Tom mailbag –
The manager understands he is accountable. The result he achieves on a key metric is well below the expectation which he or she clearly understood. They have achieved success before on this same metric but are now way off acceptable performance. What now?
Indeed, what now? Embedded in your question are stratum II descriptions of problem solving.
- Solve problems based on experience.
- Solve problems based on documented experience.
- Solve problems based on best practices.
- Solve problems according to standard operating procedures.
All of these methods have delivered output according to the metric before. They achieved success before on this same metric, but now, are way off acceptable performance. What now?
They now face a problem they have not faced before and their stratum II problem solving methods fail them. Understand this team can solve all the routine problems, but now faced with this problem, they struggle, even the supervisor. This is where the stratum III manager must step in. This problem requires a stratum III solution.
- Solve problems through root cause analysis.
- Solve problems through A-B testing.
- Solve problems through comparative analysis.
- Solve problems through what-if?
Solving problems with these methods requires a higher level of capability on the part of the manager. And that’s what a manager is for, to bring value to the problem solving and decision making of the team.
Team members can solve the routine problems and make the routine decisions, it’s when they struggle, they need the active support and coaching from their manager. This is the critical nature of managerial accountability and the building block of organizational structure.